Rob Thomas, Disconnection | | Print | |
Monday, 30 November 2009 21:41 |
I am publicly declaring my desire for a disconnection between myself and the CoS organization who is destroying any semblance of what the original intention of LRH is.
|
Rob Thomas, Disconnection | | Print | |
Monday, 30 November 2009 21:41 |
I am publicly declaring my desire for a disconnection between myself and the CoS organization who is destroying any semblance of what the original intention of LRH is.
|
Discover what people really say about all things Scientology
Shocking, unbiased consumer reviews covering every Scientology book, lecture, course, auditing level, organization and program — more than 300 in all. Probe the depths or write your own honest reviews.
An answer to the corrupt monopoly of Scientology
This website is a simple answer to those who tried to monopolize and corporatize spiritual freedom: An open gateway dedicated to helping people move up to higher levels of awareness and ability under their own steam.
"Scientology has been taken over by a self-appointed dictator, David Miscavige, who has turned the Creed of the Church of Scientology, the Code of a Scientologist, and the Credo of a True Group Member on their heads and instituted the virtual practice of Reverse (Black) Dianetics..." Learn More...
Comments
But may I suggest you another attitude:
"more communication, not less, is the answer". Communicate your point of view to as much a as Scientologists you can find, and be ready to accept their communication in return. Honesty and Truth do not fear communication but Lies do, and those wonderful people entrapped in Co$ lies, when they will start to wake up and look around, they will need all your communication and understanding.
I like your suggestion and use it on other people but not the sheep I addressed above. I wrote this out of frustration of the reverse bigotry I have received from too many idiots just because I left that cult. When I told them why I left they all gave me the "as long as you don't fuck with my religion we can be friends" bit. So I will let them have their "religion'.
I am tired of dealing with sheep. They are on their own. They need to be responsible for waking themselves up and it is not my responsibility to give them data anymore since it is everywhere now.
While you have the right to do as you wish, I don't know you personally so have never "been connected" but I would like to say that this type of handling never worked for me in the church nor will it work outside of the organization. It seems that by your action you are granting credence to the policy of disconnection. I vote for not carrying on the bad habits and handlings.
Don't you think it may be wise to take responsibility to enlighten your connections in whatever manner possible to help them see what is going on? How many people could you reach by maintaining ARC?
Just a thought.
Rob is just getting in ethics. His comm is directed toward those people who still side with David Miscavige, who are condoning criminality and the subversion and destruction of Scientology. I think Rob is standing up for what is right and that takes courage.
I do fully understand what you mean. But pls. observe the emotion that your post is emoting. You may be right, but please take on a higher emotion. As Marty says take the middle way and don't go into the extremes on the other side.
When in doubt communicate. It is an universal solvent! Nevertheless it's your holy right! Have a nice day!
Anything else would have been MIS emotion or misplaced emotion. It is real. It is how I felt at the time.
I am not taking an extreme. I am exercising my right to not want to deal with them. The other extreme from the side of communicating would be calling and arguing with each of them.
I haven't gone on Nightline. Marty did though, is that extreme or is that communicating? I want to to duplicate you.
I am not interested in them and not interested in the idea of ARC with them until they drink the water.
I appreciate your viewpoint.
Even though it seems the people you are speaking to in your post didn't fully get or acknowledge what you were imparting nor its importance, I am sure you planted a seed. A seed that just may grow as they start observing things on their own (although not as fast as you would like).
Having been a church member for 30'ish years and at the top of the Bridge I, too, would probably not have been willing to sit and listen to someone - not even my closest friends. After all, we have been quite well trained in that regard :-)
Someone simply asked me if I saw the St. Pete Times articles about "these guys" that left the Sea Org and were talking to the media. I had not seen the articles but promptly went to have a look. What I read was just enough to validate some things I personally had seen but did not say anything about. Things suddenly started making a bit more sense. Of course, "those guys" in the articles were people I knew or knew about.
The seed had been planted and it grew.
Your friends just may come around yet.
Scientology was designed to rid someone of conditioning and the effects of it. Instead we were conditioned.
I expect for them all to come around. I don't see how any organization such as that one can last.
I've been thinking it over what you said and my answer to it. Honestly said I don't know what to answer. As far I can understand you wouldn't even want to communicate to me as I'm still a member of C.O.S.. Would you be so strict ?
I'm in a process of confronting the matter and in fact I'm withholding from my fellow Scientologists as I know they don't understand, nevertheless I can accept their belief and stay in comm. (business, friendship)and they accept i don't go to church or up the bridge and they don't want to handle it. Brrrr its difficult to come to a reasonnable idea.....so...i continue to think it over and hope that I'll be able to give you a sensible answer in the next days.
Nevertheless I admire your courage for saying what you think. Could be, that's my problem ???
I congratulate you for being able to face what you are facing. I was in the same phase you were. Perhaps it is strict, but you are in a different condition that the bulk of the people I am addressing above. They can't even LOOK and in that regard as you and I once were, they are TRAPPED. It sucks. You didn't know this but in 2007 when I finally stopped pretending to be a group member (possibly as you are now) and told my wife at the time after she asked if I was ever going to Tampa Org again, "Never, I am done with SCN". We got a divorce. So when your wife chooses a cult over you after 8 years of marriage, you get to point where saying what you think becomes the orders of the day. I left and came back home to Dallas and she stayed in clearwater with our "friends". Out of over 100 people only 1 called me to ask how I was doing and that was Jerod Hanson. He is the only friend I really had there.
I found that saying what I thought, especially to the top of OSA - Kathy True, my C/S - Amy Devoe and my auditor - Sheldon Goldberg and then my ex wife felt GREAAT! It hadn't been done for 6 years. Talk about freedom? That was how i got out so easily and without golden rods or any of that other stuff. They were all jaws on the ground. They had no responses because I was so fully self expressed and so IN integrity that they knew it, probably admired it(although they may not know it) and wished they could do the same.
I am hoping this is true for everyone addressed above. But I am not interested in draggin them to the water and then forcing them to drink it when they hate water.
Each person takes responsibility for getting in. I say the same for getting out. Based on my experience only.
As for that being your problem: take a look. Is it?
Your announcement echoes exactly what I recently decided, myself. I started to rehab my
own integrity at precisely the moment I decided that I REALLY didn't have to accept any communication that I myself did not want (sound familiar?). And I did NOT want the comm that had been coming at me (and it was "coming at me," not to me)from the c of s for years.
I stopped accepting it. I calmed down. My life calmed down. I could see the outpoints more clearly and I could think my own thoughts about them, my thoughts and decisions no longer scrambled by the constant noise. I began to de-PTS!
So I say, good for you! May those who are don't yet see the value of this decision one day have the clarity to make it for themselves.
The mest helped nothing as far as I am concerned. Interesting question, by the way. New bldgs are against what Ron wanted. So are events. The mest is helping one person - DM. It is helping him create a huge real estate dynasty that he could run off with and no one could do anything about it. I suspect this will happen soon. I suspect he is a billionaire with these real estate holdings plus the money I suspect he is siphoning off of the IAS.
The "out tech" became more and more prevalent the more I left the group.
RSS feed for comments to this post